Tutorials



Monday 25 October (Tentative Schedule)

Odeum, second floor Campus Center, WPI


8:00 am Registration and Coffee

8:40 am First Tutorial Session

Laser Confocal Microscopy
- Mario GislaoIndustrial Marketing and Applications Specialist, Olympus America

Characterization of local features on functional surfaces

François Blateyron, DigitalSurf,

10:20 am Break and Exhibits and Posters

10:40 am Second Tutorial Session

Utilizing Scanning Probe Microscopy for Inspection, Measurement, and Analysis at the Nano Scale
David Faddis PhD, Nanosurf
Bret Lapointe, Nanosurf

Friction and Surface Texture
- Dr. Don Cohen, Michigan Metrology


12:20 pm Lunch and Exhibits and Posters

1:10 pm Third Tutorial Session

Nano- and Atom-scale Length Metrology
- Dr. Ted Vorburger , NIST


Finite Element Modeling for Metrologists 
- Prof. Mary Kathryn Thompson, KAIST
- Prof. John M. Thompson, Consulting Engineer

2:50 pm Break and Exhibits and posters

3:10 pm Fourth Tutorial Session

Using Statistics to Analyze Surface Measurements

- Prof. Marnie Ham, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 

Fundamentals in Grinding
- Bi Zhang, UConn, USA

4:50-6:00 pm Welcome reception
6:00-7:00 special Gallery opening and lab tours at Worcester Art Museum



Tentative tutorial presenters and topics to be scheduled
François Blateyron, DigitalSurf, Feature Parameters and Segmentation

Abstracts and Bio Sketches

Laser Confocal Microscopy is one of the fastest growing methodologies of choice for fast, accurate and repeatable surface metrology, in application areas such as material science, microelectronics, medical manufacturing, and nano-scale technology.  Unlike alternative technologies, laser confocal microscopes allow for surface metrology without any sample preparation, provide the ability to analyze specimens with high-angle slopes (ie. up to 85 deg), offer superb lateral resolution and can acquire stunning 3D color images.  Further, today's Industrial-specific laser confocal microscopes are extremely user friendly, where operators can acquire images and attain accurate measurement results with minimal training.  This session will provide students with a basic fundamental understanding of confocal microscopy, discuss application examples where confocal microscopy is prevalent, advantages / disadvantages in comparison with alternative methodoliges of surface metrology and discuss accuracy and repeatability of the laser confocal microscope.  The hands-on session will follow, demonstrating laser confocal microscopy in a practical environment.

Mario J. Gislao is currently employed by Olympus America as an Industrial Marketing and Applications Specialist, and has been within the Olympus organization for half a decade.  He possesses a dozen years of experience within the field of Industrial Microscopy and Metrology.  Mario offers a diverse blend of expertise in the areas of technical marketing, sales and business development.  During his time with Olympus, Mario’s product management, marketing and sales support efforts have resulted in consistent growth in their field of Industrial and Material Science Image-Analysis.  He holds a degree in Electrical Engineering Technology from the State University of New York and resides in the New York City suburbs.

Characterization of local features on functional surfaces
François Blateyron, Digital Surf
In surface analysis, quantitative evaluation is carried out by calculating global parameters, either by averaging or integrating heights (Ra, Rmr, Sq …) or based on the Fourier transform or autocorrelation (Sal, Std) which are also global methods. The new ISO 25178 standard calls these parameters “field parameters”. They are useful on homogeneous (stationary) surfaces but they do not provide any information on local surface “events” such as defects, scratches or geometrical features.
However, a new category of parameters, called “feature parameters” make it possible to characterize local features such as peaks, pits, cells, pores, hills, particles, objects, etc. detected by segmentation using watersheds and Wolf pruning. Feature parameters are not only based on heights but also on curvature, length, volume and morphological characteristics (size, orientation, density…) They are calculated only on selected sub-areas of the surface and provide valuable information on surface function, especially when wear, friction, lubrication or finish is involved.
This tutorial reviews these parameters and their use in selected applications.
 
François Blateyron has been working in the field of surface texture analysis for twenty years. Expert in the development of metrology algorithms and surface analysis solutions, he has been also an active member of standardization committees (ISO TC213) and project leader for several documents included in the ISO 25178 standard. He is now COO of Digital Surf, France, developer of Mountains Technology®, the industry-standard surface imaging and analysis solution used by leading instrument manufacturers worldwide.
 

Utilizing Scanning Probe Microscopy for Inspection, Measurement, and Analysis at the Nano Scale.
David Faddis PhD, Director of Technology and Applications, Nanosurf Inc.
Brent LaPointe , North East Sales, Nanosurf Inc.
    Many of today’s high-tech products rely on nano-level functional structures, and in products such as mobile phones and integrated circuits they have already become commonplace. With increasing demands on products and their quality, small structures and the ability to evaluate them are also becoming decisive factors for the production of everyday products.
    Since the introduction of the AFM in 1985 by Binning and Quate, the window to the nanoscale world was opened.  The utility of Scanning Probe Microscopy has grown beyond its origins to encompass analyses of areal roughness, tribology, and probe-sample interactions involving conductivity, magnetic force, thermal conductivity, biological spectroscopy, and analysis of single molecules.    
    Understanding how and when to apply these varied techniques is of great importance in metrology, research and development, and in production, for quality control.  This presentation will compare and contrast these methodologies, examine the data that each provides, and detail supporting case studies.
    We will quantitatively evaluate how areal roughness will influence the efficiency of a solar cell, how ball point pens and paper may be evaluated to improve writing performance, and examine how processing steps can influence the nanoscale feature quality of finished goods.  We will also examine how more advanced techniques such as Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy (KPFM), Magnetic Force Microscopy (MFM), and Scanning Thermal (SThM) can be used to further elucidate the link between nanoscale structure and the macroscopic features/quality of a product. Following the tutorial, we will be available to demonstrate select SPM techniques with prepared substrates.   
 
David Faddis PhD,  Polymer Science, University of Akron
Director of Technology and Applications, Nanosurf Inc.
15+ years experience in AFM industry in management and applications development
 
Brent LaPointe
North East Sales, Nanosurf Inc.
10+ years experience in biological and systems engineering and micro fluidics

Friction and Surface Texture
Donald K.  Cohen
Michigan Metrology, LLC

Understanding the relationship between the surface texture and friction has been a challenge for many centuries. Many theories have been proposed and either validated or dismissed based on experimental results. With the advent of advanced surface metrology tools, the nature of the sliding interface is being further understood. This presentation will review the historical thinking about friction leading to the seminal research in the mid 20th century by Bowden and Tabor and the subsequent work by Geenwood and Williamson. The friction of lubricated systems and surface texture will also be presented including a demonstration of 
direct numerical modeling techniques.

Using Statistics to Analyze Surface Measurements
Prof. Marnie Ham,
University of Ontario Institute of Technology 

Objective - The objective is to present methods of applying statistical techniques for determining significant differences in surface topography, both using small data sets and large data sets.

Importance - Assist researchers and engineers in determining a way to use statistics to define how different surfaces are or to determine if there is a measurable difference in the surfaces.

Topics - Basic review of statistics (i.e., normal vs non-normal, continuous vs discrete, mean, median, etc.)     - application of statistics to surface topography.

Case Studies - We will look at statistics have been used in surface research Common Mistakes and Pitfall - We will look at issues that have arisen through the improper use of statistics or the use of no statistics.

Prof. Marnie Ham

    Dr Ham is an Assistant Professor of Engineering at University of Ontario Institute of Ontario, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada. She is a graduate of GMI Engineering & Management Institute (Flint, Mi) and Queen’s University. She is a Professional Engineer in the Province of Ontario, since 1999. Dr Ham holds a Black Belt in Six Sigma.
    Dr. Ham has held engineering positions at: Ford Motor Company of Canada Limited, Bombardier Aerospace, MeadWestvaco, and United Parcel Service of Canada. She is an adjunct professor at Queen’s University and an affiliate professor to Worcester Polytechnic Institute.
    Her research interests are in: Asymmetric Incremental Sheet Forming (AISF), Surface Texture and Quality, Life Cycle Engineering (LCE), Applied Statistics, and Statistical Quality Control. Her research program has been funded by NSERC, OCE, and Nelson Industries. Dr Ham’s research efforts focus on design, development and optimizing sheet metal manufacturing processes, especially AISF. AISF is a dieless sheet metal forming process, which allows users to provide customization within sheet metal parts.


Nano- and Atom-scale Length Metrology

T.V. Vorburger, R.G. Dixson, N.G. Orji, J. Fu, R.A. Allen, M.W. Cresswell, and V.A. Hackley

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)

Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA

Measurements of length at the nano-scale have increasing importance in manufacturing, especially in the electronics and biomedical industries.  The properties of linewidth and step height are critical to the function and specification of semiconductor devices.  The ability to manufacture small particles of controlled sizes is critical for developing diagnostic and therapeutic products in the rapidly growing biomedical industries.  We review here four topics associated with calibrated measurements of nano-scale lengths at NIST:

·                     The ability to manufacture smaller linewidths leads to semiconductors with increased performance.  However, control of linewidth requires accurate measurement to determine whether specifications are met.  NIST has developed physical standards with linewidths ranging from about 70 nm to about 225 nm.  These lines are fabricated in single crystal silicon using directional etching techniques to produce vertical sidewalls and uniform widths.  The lines have been calibrated by critical dimension atomic force microscopes (CD-AFMs) with probe-tip offsets calibrated by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM).  The combined standard uncertainty of the calibrated linewidths is as small as ±1 nm.   

·                     Commercial step heights as small as about 8 nm provide a source of calibration for AFMs used to measure surface roughness and step heights. For calibration of smaller heights, we have performed measurements of the lattice-based step height on the Si (111) crystal surface using a calibrated AFM (C-AFM).  When combined with values derived from other measurements, this leads to a recommended value of the Si (111) step height of 312 pm ± 12 pm, which is useful for calibrating atomic force microscopes working at their highest levels of magnification.  We have also used the C-AFM to calibrate lattice-based, 1 nm step-height standards fabricated from SiC at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Glenn Research Center.  The measurements of the SiC step height yield an average value of 0.981 nm ± 0.019 nm.  

·                     NIST has participated with other national measurement institutes (NMIs) in three supplementary international comparisons in nanometrology.  The results are published on a Website of the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (www.bipm.org) along with similar comparisons in other fields to show the degree of consistency between measurements of the NMIs. We discuss here the results of the comparisons for pitch, step height, and crossed-grating angle.  

·                     NIST has developed gold particle size references for use in the biomedical industries. These are Reference Materials 8011, 8012, and 8013, with nominal particle sizes of 10 nm, 30 nm, and 60 nm respectively. NIST has used widely different techniques to measure them.  Dimensional reference values are reported for the mean particle diameters in different environments: solution, as an aerosol, and deposited on a substrate.  The techniques include AFM, TEM, scanning electron microscopy, electrospray-differential mobility analysis, dynamic light scattering, and small-angle x-ray scattering.



Theodore Vorburger is a Guest Researcher and Former Group Leader of the Surface and Microform Metrology Group in the Precision Engineering Division at the National Institute of Standards and Technology.  This group is responsible for surface roughness and step height calibrations, which underpin the U.S. measurement system for surface finish, and for traceable linewidth measurements using critical dimension atomic force microscopes. Ted is co-leader of a project to develop standard bullets and standard casings for forensics laboratories.  He has also led the development of a calibrated atomic force microscope for calibrations of surface nano-scale length specimens, the development of atom-based step height standards for calibration of atomic force microscopes, and the development of a light scattering system for measuring surface roughness, and has collaborated in the development of the world’s first sinusoidal-roughness Standard Reference Materials.  He is a member and former Chair of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Standards Committee B46 on the Classification and Designation of Surface Qualities and a Subject Matter Expert for the equivalent Working Group under the International Organization for Standardization (ISO).  Ted has been working in Surface Metrology since 1976 and is the author or co-author of more than 200 publications in the fields of surface metrology, nanometrology, surface physics, atomic physics, chemical physics, and automated measurements. Between March 2007 and April 2008, Ted worked on detail as Acting Deputy Director of the Center for Nanoscale Science and Technology, a new organizational unit of NIST. He holds a B.S. degree from Manhattan College and an M.S. and Ph.D. from Yale University, all in Physics. 

 



Finite Element Modeling for Metrologists 
Mary Kathryn Thompson, KAIST
John M. Thompson, Consulting Engineer

Although surface metrology is often used in manufacturing to verify that surface finishes and small scale geometries have been correctly fabricated, it is equally useful in the design of components and systems where the behavior is dominated by the surface. Numerical modeling techniques, like the finite element method, can be used to predict the performance of functional surfaces. It can also be used to propose alternative surface geometries or surface finishing techniques to improve that performance.
    This tutorial will present some of the tools and techniques that we have developed for the incorporation of surface features in finite element models. In particular, we will discuss the use of surface metrology data vs. the creation of probabilistic surface topography. We will present methods that can be used to format surface metrology data for importation into a commercial finite element program (ANSYS) as well as methods to generate probabilistic surface arrays. We will demonstrate how to use this information to create top down and bottom up solid model geometry and how to create or modify the finite element model (nodes and elements) directly. Issues associated with setting up and solving finite element models associated with loads and boundary conditions will be addressed. We will show the types of results that can be expected from a finite element model and discuss how to interpret them. Finally, we will discuss the current challenges and limitations of these techniques and the future of surface modeling.
    This tutorial is intended for a general audience. However, references with more detailed information for those wishing to adopt these techniques will also be provided.

 Contact Information:

Mary Kathryn Thompson, Ph.D
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
373-1 Guseong-Dong, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon 305-701
Republic of Korea (South Korea)
Email: mkt@kaist.edu
Tel: (82)+42-350-3628

MARY KATHRYN THOMPSON is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology. She is the director of the KAIST Laboratory for Innovative Design and Engineering Analysis where she is pioneering finite element modeling of surface phenomena. She also holds joint appointments in the Mechanical Engineering, Ocean Systems Engineering, and Industrial Design Departments at KAIST. Prof. Thompson earned her BS, MS, and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).

JOHN M. THOMPSON is a Professor in the Department of Applied Engineering and Technology at the California University of Pennsylvania.  He is the coordinator of the Technology Management program and the University liaison for the Pennsylvania Nanofabrication Manufacturing Technology consortium. Prof. Thompson has an active engineering consulting practice, including over 20 years with ANSYS, Inc
. and is a leading expert on the use of ANSYS user programmable features. Prof. Thompson earned his BS, MS, and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh. 

 

 

Fundamentals in Grinding 
Bi Zhang, Professor
University of Connecticut

This tutorial will cover the fundamental issues in grinding. The topics include:
    1.      Grinding kinematics
    2.      Abrasive-workpiece interactions and material compatibility
    3.      Grinding wheel properties
    4.      Grinding wheel truing and dressing
    5.      Ground workpiece evaluation
    6.      Case study: grinding of ceramic materials

The tutorial will be oriented towards industrial engineers and academic researchers who have limited knowledge on grinding. It will last for about 2 hours. Handouts will be provided.


About the speaker: Dr. Zhang is a professor of mechanical engineering at the University of Connecticut. He received his Ph.D. degree from the Tokyo Institute of Technology in 1988. Dr. Zhang’s primary accomplishments lie in research on grinding of advanced materials and design of critical machine tool components for precision manufacturing. He is an associate member of the CIRP, and a member of ASME, ASPE, SME, and JSPE.

Maintained by surfacewebmaster@wpi.edu
Last modified: 3 September 2010